Biocracked
Approach: conceptual metaphor. Palette: D, bold color field.

A single AA-style cylindrical battery stands upright, fully charged, on a seamless saturated mustard-yellow backdrop. Beside it sits a matching, untouched, slightly dusty glass jar of marbles, so the charge shows no visible link to any result. More precisely, a bright tomato-red extension cord plugs into the battery's top. Its other end curls away unconnected, lying on the floor beside an unlit incandescent bulb. A small electric green LED glows on the battery's side as the only green accent. Camera: low three-quarter angle, 50mm lens, shallow depth of field, with the bulb softly blurred in the foreground. Lighting: hard, clean studio key light from the upper left, with crisp shadows falling to the right on the yellow surface. Mood: puzzled, wry, a full power source that fails to light anything.
Supplements

Nicotinamide Riboside Doubled NAD+ but Failed to Boost Memory

Nova Chen · · 4 min read

The Number Looked Great. The Memory Results Didn't.

Imagine a supplement that does exactly what the label promises. It doubles the level of a molecule your cells depend on. Then you check whether it helped the thing people actually buy it for, and the answer is no.

That is roughly what happened in a new phase-II pilot trial of nicotinamide riboside (NR) in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). The study was led by Martens and colleagues and published in Alzheimer's & Dementia in 2026. Blood NAD+ rose twofold, but cognition did not improve.

What the Researchers Did

The team ran a 12-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study. They wanted to know whether NR, a precursor of NAD+, could improve cognitive function and cerebral blood flow (CBF) in adults with aMCI. aMCI is a memory-focused form of mild cognitive impairment that carries elevated risk of progressing to Alzheimer's disease.

The rationale is a popular one. NAD+ is central to cellular energy metabolism, and the study's introduction notes that declining NAD+ may raise the risk of Alzheimer's disease. If you can restore NAD+, the thinking goes, you might protect the aging brain.

Forty-two participants completed the trial: 22 in the NR group and 20 on placebo.

The Results at a Glance

  • Blood NAD+: Increased about twofold in the NR group. The supplement did what it was supposed to do biochemically.
  • Cognitive function (primary outcome): No improvement.
  • Total cerebral blood flow (secondary): No improvement.
  • Blood pressure (secondary): No improvement.
  • Safety and adherence: Adherence was similar between groups, and there were no serious adverse effects.

The authors' conclusion is plain: NR effectively raises NAD+ in people with MCI but does not improve cognitive function, total CBF, or blood pressure over 12 weeks.

The Hippocampus Hint (Handle With Care)

There was one intriguing wrinkle. Exploratory analyses suggested potential increases in regional cerebral blood flow, particularly in the hippocampus, a region closely tied to memory and among the first affected in Alzheimer's disease.

This is not a win. Exploratory analyses are hypothesis-generating by design. They were not the primary outcome, and with a small sample, such signals can easily appear by chance. The authors say only that future studies should investigate regional CBF effects over longer treatment durations. It is a reason to keep looking, not a reason to buy.

Why Raising NAD+ Isn't the Same as Fixing the Brain

This trial is a useful reminder that a biomarker moving is not a clinical outcome improving. Doubling blood NAD+ shows the compound was absorbed and metabolized. It does not show that the change reached the brain in a meaningful way, or that low NAD+ was the bottleneck in these participants' cognitive decline.

Mild cognitive impairment is also driven by many overlapping processes, including protein accumulation, vascular changes, and inflammation. A single metabolic precursor may simply not be enough to shift those over 12 weeks.

Honest Limitations

Before anyone over-reads this study in either direction, consider what it can and can't tell us:

  • It's a pilot. With 42 completers, the study was built to assess safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy, not to settle the question.
  • 12 weeks is short. Cognitive decline in aMCI is slow. A longer trial might show effects this one couldn't, or might not.
  • One population. The results apply to older adults with aMCI. They don't tell us about healthy adults, younger people, or other conditions.
  • Exploratory findings are tentative. The hippocampal blood flow signal needs confirmation.
  • A negative result is not proof of no effect. Small trials can miss modest benefits, though the lack of any signal on the primary outcome is worth taking seriously.

Practical Takeaways for Buyers

What NAD+ boosters can do: In this trial, NR reliably raised blood NAD+ and was well tolerated, with no serious adverse effects.

What this study doesn't show: It gives no evidence that NR improves memory, thinking, total brain blood flow, or blood pressure in people with aMCI over 12 weeks.

Dose and timing: The abstract doesn't specify the dose, and the trial wasn't designed to test timing. Check the full paper for the exact regimen before drawing comparisons. Commercial NR products vary widely in dose, and nothing here supports a particular dose or time of day for a cognitive benefit.

Who it's (not) for: If you or a relative has memory concerns, this study gives no reason to treat NR as a substitute for medical evaluation, proven lifestyle measures, or approved care. Anyone with MCI or on other medications should talk to a clinician before starting supplements.

Marketing red flag: Be skeptical of any product that cites "increased NAD+" as proof of brain benefits. This trial shows those are separate claims.

The Bottom Line

NR passed the biochemistry test and failed the memory test, at least over 12 weeks in a small group with aMCI. The hippocampal blood flow hint keeps the door open for longer, larger studies. For now, the honest message is that NAD+ boosters can raise NAD+, and whether that translates into a better brain is still unproven.

Source: Martens et al. A phase-II randomized controlled pilot study of nicotinamide riboside supplementation in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement. 2026. DOI: 10.1002/alz.71605 | PubMed 42478598

Original study

Read the original research on pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov →

This article summarizes published research for general information. It is not medical advice.

NC

Written by

Nova Chen

Nova Chen writes for Biocracked: biohacking science, longevity & human performance.

Related Articles

A bright, minimalist editorial still life on a pale warm-white stone surface, shot from a slightly elevated three-quarter angle in soft natural window light. At center, a small amber glass supplement bottle with a matte cream label, unbranded, sits beside a few loose white capsules. A pair of weathered hands in a light oatmeal linen sleeve, belonging to an older adult, rests gently near the bottle, with a ceramic mug of tea just out of focus. To the right, a clean glass vial and a delicate glass beaker filled with clear liquid catch the light, hinting at laboratory research without any futuristic touch. A small paper notebook with a handwritten simple line graph rising in a gentle curve lies open nearby, along with a sharpened pencil. Scattered at the edges are soft sprigs of dried eucalyptus and a few pale sage-green leaves, adding an organic note. A faint, abstract molecular diagram printed in muted teal ink on a card leans against the bottle, subtle and graphic. The palette is calm and modern: warm ivory, sage green, soft teal, muted amber, and touches of dusty peach. Long, gentle shadows fall across the surface, and the shallow depth of field blurs the background into creamy neutral tones. The composition leaves generous negative space on the left third for headline text. The overall feel is a trendy health and science journal: clean, airy, trustworthy, and quietly sophisticated, with fine film-like grain and true-to-life color. Ultra-detailed, 16:9 landscape.
supplements

1,000 mg of Nicotinamide Riboside Daily Raised Blood Cell NAD+ by About 60% in Older Adults, Randomized Trial Finds

BY DR. SYNAPSE ·

A 2018 Nature Communications crossover trial tested nicotinamide riboside at 500 mg twice daily (1,000 mg/day) for six weeks in healthy middle-aged and older adults. The supplement was well tolerated and raised NAD+ in blood immune cells by about 60% compared with placebo. Researchers also saw early signals for lower blood pressure and arterial stiffness, which they flagged as ideas for larger trials, not proven benefits. This article explains why NAD+ is thought to fall with age, what the study did, and what it cannot tell us about disease outcomes or longevity.

Approach: conceptual metaphor. Palette: bold color field.

A single AA-style cylindrical battery, shown as a real object with a bare metal cap and a plain unlabeled matte sleeve, stands upright on a glossy surface. It is photographed from a low three-quarter angle against a saturated tomato-red seamless backdrop. The battery is half-filled with a translucent amber liquid that visibly rises inside a clear glass cutaway section. A thin ribbon of electric green light (#00e676) wraps around its base like a charging band. Soft large-softbox light comes from the upper left and produces crisp highlights on the metal and a clean, slightly blurred red reflection beneath it. A second, shorter battery sits out of focus behind, nearly drained and empty, to suggest contrast. The mood is energetic, optimistic and precise, with a tactile product-photography look and shallow depth of field.
supplements

NR + Pterostilbene Lifts NAD+ ~40–90% in Human Trial

BY NOVA CHEN ·

Can a daily capsule of nicotinamide riboside and pterostilbene raise NAD+ in older adults? In the first-in-human NRPT (Basis) trial, 120 people aged 60 to 80 took it for eight weeks. Blood NAD+ rose about 40% at the recommended dose and about 90% at double the dose, and the rise held steady through the study. No serious adverse events were reported. Here is what the numbers show, what the dose takeaways are, and what the study cannot tell you.

A softly lit editorial still life on a pale oat-colored linen surface, shot from a slightly elevated three-quarter angle in a wide landscape frame. At center-left, a small matte white ceramic dish holds a modest pile of fine off-white powder, with a tiny brushed-brass measuring spoon resting beside it. Next to the dish stands a minimalist amber glass supplement bottle with a plain cream label and no readable text. A few capsules spill casually across the linen, some translucent and some opaque ivory.

On the right side of the composition, a ripe blood orange cut in half and a handful of raw almonds sit on a light ash-wood board. A sprig of fresh rosemary adds a muted green accent. A sheer glass of water catches the light and throws a soft, rippled caustic pattern across the fabric.

In the background, out of focus, a woman's hand in a soft sage-green knit sleeve rests near a ceramic mug. This suggests a calm morning routine without showing a face. Behind her, a tall window casts diffused, golden-hour light from the upper left, with gentle shadows and a creamy, shallow depth of field.

The palette is warm and restrained: oat, ivory, terracotta, sage, and amber, with a single pop of coral from the blood orange. A thin, abstract line of muted terracotta paint, like a brushed arc, sweeps across the upper right background. It subtly evokes a rising curve without becoming a literal chart.

The mood is calm, trustworthy, and contemporary, like a premium wellness and science journal feature. The image has crisp focus on the powder and bottle, natural film-like grain, soft contrast, and generous negative space in the upper third for headline overlay. It looks like a high-end editorial photograph with no text, logos, or futuristic elements.
metabolism

NMN's First Human Win: 250 mg a Day Lifted Muscle Insulin Sensitivity by About 25% in Prediabetic Women

BY DR. SYNAPSE ·

NMN has long been a darling of the longevity market, but human evidence was thin until a 2021 Washington University trial published in Science. In postmenopausal women with prediabetes who were overweight or obese, 250 mg of NMN daily for 10 weeks improved muscle insulin sensitivity by roughly 25%. Muscle insulin signaling and genes tied to muscle remodeling also improved, while the placebo group saw no change. But the benefit was narrow, and the study did not show NMN lowering blood sugar or reversing prediabetes. Here's what the trial found, who it applies to, and what it didn't change.

Approach: conceptual metaphor. Palette: bold color field.

Subject: two identical brushed-steel analog pressure gauges side by side on a saturated mustard-yellow seamless backdrop, shot straight-on at eye level with a 85mm lens. The left gauge's needle swings down toward the low end, the right gauge's needle swings up into the high end, so they point in opposite directions. The dials are blank, with only unlabeled tick marks. A tiny electric green glass indicator lamp glows on the left gauge's rim. Lighting is a large softbox from the upper left, giving crisp highlights on the chrome bezels and short, clean shadows on the yellow surface. Shallow depth of field softens the background edges. Mood: playful, precise and tense, a visual argument between two opposing results.
longevity

NR Lowered Muscle Epigenetic Age. HIIT Pushed the Other Way

BY HELIX WARD ·

NR and HIIT are both billed as ways to keep muscle young, but a new Aging Cell paper found they can pull epigenetic clocks in opposite directions. Five months of nicotinamide riboside was associated with reduced muscle epigenetic age acceleration, especially on the PCHannum, MEAT, and DunedinPACE clocks. HIIT moved some clocks the other way, raising the pace of aging on DunedinPACE. The link between the two may be mitochondria, since changes in muscle mitochondrial content correlated with changes in MEAT-based age acceleration. Here is what the study actually shows, what it doesn't, and how to read it without overreacting.

This page is available in